Dear Ladies & gentlemen, 
      
      It is a pleasure for me to send the link I have found on youtube with 
      the minute-long recording that includes Tchaikovsky's voice. It is exactly 
      the same excerpt as the one mentioned being included in the CD-set. But 
      contrary to the CD-set, we find here in addition the simultanous 
      translation of what every one is saying and also a the name (and picture) 
      of who is speaking. 
      
      
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ocfv5NLydk 
            
 
      
      It is really fascinating to listen to Tchaikovsky's voice; from this 
      very short recording we can indeed feel that it must have been very funny 
      and enjoyable to be in Tchaikovsky's company - as has been mentioned by 
      many of his friends. Clearly, Tchaikovsky was NOT a dull or always sad and 
      depressive person. 
      
      With best regards, 
      
      Guido Muehlemann 
      31/12/2012 10:46
      
      
      Tchaikovsky Research : 
      Endorsement of Thomas Edison’s "Phonograph" (TH 318) 
      Here on our own "Tchaikovsky Research" we have a detailed report on 
      this particular recording of his voice as well as his views on the 
      phonograph as per Edison..included is also a history of the phonograph...I 
      think this gives a more creditable account of what happened that day when 
      the recording was made... 
      
      Albert Gasparo 
      11/01/2013 21:26
      
      In a previous entry Mr Brett Langston mentions the following: 
      
      
        It has been supposed that the order of the names given on the label 
        is the same order in which the participants are heard—in which case 
        Tchaikovsky's voice appears three times (once whistling), sounding 
        surprisingly shrill. We know from personal recollections of his 
        contemporaries that his voice was "a rather pleasing baritone", so 
        either this shrillness must either stem from the method of the 
        recording, or the participants have not been identified correctly. The 
        latter is certainly possible, since another source states that Anton 
        Rubinstein resolutely refused to utter a single word into the infernal 
        machine—if true, this means he could not be the first voice as labelled, 
        and the sequence must be thrown into doubt. 
      
      
      In the book "Tchaikovsky through others' Eyes" edited by Alexander 
      Poznansky the following recollection by Leonid Sabaneyev is mentioned on 
      page 216: 
      
      
        Block asked Pyotr Ilyich to play something, or at least, to say 
        something. Tchaikovsky frowned and tried to disappear before refusing 
        decisively. 
        
        "I am a bad pianist and my voice is raspy. Why should one eternalize 
        it?" 
      
      
      So from this entry of Tchaikovsky describing his own voice it does seem 
      that the order of the participants in the recording is correct - so that 
      we are actually listening to Tchaikovsky's voice. 
      Philip de Vos
      16/06/2013 17:18
      
      I'm not sure how you reach that conclusion Philip. Tchaikovsky's voice 
      was 'raspy' because he had some teeth missing, giving him a slight lisp, 
      and that had nothing to do with the pitch of his voice. And if Tchaikovsky 
      had 'refuse decisively' to participate, then it couldn't have been him 
      anyway.  
      Brett Langston
      18/06/2013 10:59